3 ms·

> And the single biggest channel for that is the open web. No, streamed or buffered audio and video are the biggest channel for that. Look at the report that I

by WayneDB 13y ago

> And the single biggest channel for that is the open web. No, streamed or buffered audio and video are the biggest channel for that. Look at the report that I posted. > Web technology does all the interesting things... My full, un-sandboxed operating system does all the interesting things... Web technology is just a kludge that runs on top of that. The Web is for things like Facebook. Operating systems and TCP/IP are for things like Rasberry Pi monitoring and controlling my solar panel array.

mwcampbell 13y ago
All of the popular full, un-sandboxed operating systems for end-users are proprietary. No, desktop GNU/Linux doesn't count. The only non-proprietary platform that has sewrious user market-share and developer mind-share is the Web platform. Therefore, as much as it may disgust us from a technical/aesthetic point of view, advancing the open Web platform is the best way to achieve certain highly desirable social/political goals.
- dkuntz2 13y ago
  And by "all of the popular full, un-sandboxed operating systems for end-users" you mean the one that isn't sandboxed, Windows? because, technically even just the popular part could mean only Windows, but the addition of un-sandboxed further cements that because OS X sandboxes things a bunch now.
- pekk 13y ago
  What do you actually mean by the 'open Web platform'?
jallmann 13y ago
>> And the single biggest channel for that is the open web. >No, streamed or buffered audio and video are the biggest channel for that. Video may take up enormous amounts of bandwidth, but the information density is very low. And it's unclear whether the time spent watching video is anywhere close to the time spent reading text, looking at pictures or navigating the links of the Web. And buffered video is delivered over HTTP... Anyway, this pedantry is tiring, st3fan has a valid point. TCP/IP is necessary, but not sufficient. It is the combination of Web technologies (TCP/IP, HTTP, HTML, etc) that is driving so much of the innovation of the past 15 years. Could the Raspberry Pi have been the success it is today without the visibility afforded by the Web? I doubt it.

by WayneDB 13y ago

mwcampbell 13y ago

All of the popular full, un-sandboxed operating systems for end-users are proprietary. No, desktop GNU/Linux doesn't count. The only non-proprietary platform that has sewrious user market-share and developer mind-share is the Web platform. Therefore, as much as it may disgust us from a technical/aesthetic point of view, advancing the open Web platform is the best way to achieve certain highly desirable social/political goals.

dkuntz2 13y ago
And by "all of the popular full, un-sandboxed operating systems for end-users" you mean the one that isn't sandboxed, Windows? because, technically even just the popular part could mean only Windows, but the addition of un-sandboxed further cements that because OS X sandboxes things a bunch now.
pekk 13y ago
What do you actually mean by the 'open Web platform'?

jallmann 13y ago

>> And the single biggest channel for that is the open web. >No, streamed or buffered audio and video are the biggest channel for that. Video may take up enormous amounts of bandwidth, but the information density is very low. And it's unclear whether the time spent watching video is anywhere close to the time spent reading text, looking at pictures or navigating the links of the Web. And buffered video is delivered over HTTP... Anyway, this pedantry is tiring, st3fan has a valid point. TCP/IP is necessary, but not sufficient. It is the combination of Web technologies (TCP/IP, HTTP, HTML, etc) that is driving so much of the innovation of the past 15 years. Could the Raspberry Pi have been the success it is today without the visibility afforded by the Web? I doubt it.