4 ms·
You should read the article (and avoid being so dismissive). Functionality like Mutation Observers are exactly the kind of abstractions that will make "dynamic
by magicalist 13y ago
You should read the article (and avoid being so dismissive). Functionality like Mutation Observers are exactly the kind of abstractions that will make "dynamic behavior and services" (as vague as that is) all the easier.
Also, maybe you have a weird definition for "widget", but go watch Bret's latest talk. It's all widgets. And it's certainly not dynamic magic; we can build interfaces like that, but more and better tools to make building them easier are a very good thing.
I'm personally really excited from what I've seen of Polymer, and even more excited about its mostly decoupled design (and the polyfill-until-standardized approach the GP comment mentions), allowing you to pick and choose what you want to use without committing to some huge (and "opinionated") framework.
- ajtaylor 13y agoYou've hit the nail on the head. Every website these days has widgets, for lack of a better word, that are reused all over the place. Anything we can do to make it easier to package up those widgets so I can drop them in place on a new html page is A Good Thing IMHO. Opinionated frameworks are great, until you need to do something they didn't anticipate. If you're lucky it's easy to work around, and if you're not then welcome to your latest nightmare. The whole polyfill concept is exactly what the world needs to allow browsers to grow and mature at different rates.