3 ms·
I felt that would not have been unfair. Also I felt that owning 50% of the company wouldn't give the founders enough skin in the game to really give the idea th
by kennethologist 13y ago
I felt that would not have been unfair. Also I felt that owning 50% of the company wouldn't give the founders enough skin in the game to really give the idea their all.
- benologist 13y agoIt's not really about taking the extra 20% it's just easier to value what that contribution was and is now worth that way. I also think one last thing to consider: was this money lent with the possibility of it never being repaid, or was this a loan that the founder/s would have carried with them if the business failed? If there was never any risk that you would lose the money then I think that lessens what you should expect to receive for it.
- kennethologist 13y agoI agree with you in retrospect and most certainly if make an investment in the future will structure it much better. With regards to the repayment of the loan. No. If the the business had failed I would have written off the money.