There is a reason I put the word 'moral' in quotes, and you just explained it. The thing is, that I think it has already become sufficiently obvious that as a s

There is a reason I put the word 'moral' in quotes, and you just explained it. The thing is, that I think it has already become sufficiently obvious that as a society, we see a need for change. Using vague terms like 'morality' make a lot more sense when you put them in a quantifiable context that represent the will of the populous. Thus I don't see the need to regress back to this 'default state' of pretending we don't know where we stand because it seems we've already established that much. Instead, presenting things that way seems to confuse and induce semantic arguments like this one because it removes knowledge that people already know; leading to [IMO] wasted brainpower -- unless a lot of people really are unaware of the current zeitgeist, in which case I would take back my arguments.