5 ms·
Garbage article with intentionally deceitful title. This shouldn't even be on HN. If there were a down vote button, I'd be clicking it ferociously.
by mhofstadt 13y ago
Garbage article with intentionally deceitful title. This shouldn't even be on HN. If there were a down vote button, I'd be clicking it ferociously.
- walid 13y agoYou need more karma points to see a down vote button.
- DanBC 13y agoThe current threshold is, I think, 750 to get downvote for comments. There's no downvote for submissions, but there is a flag button. I don't know if there's a karma threshold for that.
- mhofstadt 13y agoWow, I had no idea it was possible to earn your way up to a down vote button. Looks like I need to participate more. =)
- hispanic 13y agoWow, that's harsh. This is the part of the article that speaks to why I submitted it to HN: "He says science, not religion, resurrected the afterlife. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation meant that patients who would have died were revived, and many had stories to share." Regardless, I don't see why you consider it a "garbage article". It seems well-written to me.
- mhofstadt 13y agoEveryone is free to believe anything they want, but mixing "science" into this article is rather degrading to genuine scientific inquiry. This is an article with an agenda, and that agenda is selling a book to believers. You can find a more appropriate platform to post this on.