"> I cannot modify the software? Why not? To spare the company supporting randomly modified versions." Then why not just say that? Why not just say, "No supp

"> I cannot modify the software? Why not? To spare the company supporting randomly modified versions." Then why not just say that? Why not just say, "No support shall be provided if the software has been modified without authorization?" "I don't think it makes much practical sense, but this is an industry standard. Virtually every proprietary software license is locked down this way." Yes, well, when I said that I would not agree to it, I meant it -- because I do not agree to proprietary licenses with such terms (i.e. I do not use proprietary software).