3 ms·
As over 90% of road traffic accidents are the result of human error, I strongly disagree with your conclusion -- otherwise we wouldn't need third-party insuranc
by cstross 13y ago
As over 90% of road traffic accidents are the result of human error, I strongly disagree with your conclusion -- otherwise we wouldn't need third-party insurance for cars, either.
(On the other hand, if you're as sensible as you say, I have three words for you: no claims discount.)
- maxerickson 13y agoThe NRA apparently endorses a personal liability insurance: http://www.locktonrisk.com/nrains/excess.htm http://www.locktonrisk.com/nrains/excess.htm Quick searching is not instructive as to pricing, but I guess some homeowners policies cover gun accidents, and such insurance is not particularly expensive.
- hga 13y agoIndeed, and you can tell from the costs what the insurance companies think are the serious risks (hint, not liability). I'll just mention ratios, that I'm a USAA customer who's father was in the military (eyesight kept me out, but they have a special category for us because we're better risks), that I don't have very many guns, have a monitored alarm, and no longer get the no claims discount (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Joplin_tornado http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Joplin_tornado). All that said, I pay 4 times as much for the extra protection needed to cover loss of my guns as I do for the liability insurance that's an enumerated part of my renter's policy, and the single instance liability they're on the hook for is 35 times greater than a total loss of my listed guns and scopes.