3 ms·
Using ifs is definitely more readable than &&, words always win. However carefully alignment of && and ( can make things better. Note that the comment after "if
by chj 13y ago
Using ifs is definitely more readable than &&, words always win. However carefully alignment of && and ( can make things better. Note that the comment after "if" is necessary to keep the shape balanced.
if( /* b is same as a */
(b != nil)
&& (b->qid.type == a->qid.type)
&& (b->qid.path == a->qid.path)
&& (b->qid.vers == a->qid.vers)
&& (b->dev == a->dev)
&& (b->type == a->type)
){
fprint(2, "cp: %s and %s are the same file\n", an, bn);
ret = 1;
}
- dllthomas 13y ago"words always win" Add seven to three then multiply the whole thing by twelve. (7 + 3) * 12
- moron4hire 13y agoonly if you treat symbols as a foreign language