3 ms·
Wouldn't it make more sense to call it 1.9.1? Then there'd be a predictable link between 1.(9+x).y and 2.x.y. Now, according to the post, 1.11 will have featu
by dak1 13y ago
Wouldn't it make more sense to call it 1.9.1? Then there'd be a predictable link between 1.(9+x).y and 2.x.y.
Now, according to the post, 1.11 will have feature parity with 2.1. Will 1.12 be equivalent to 2.1.1 (assuming there is one) or 2.2? It seems needlessly confusing.
- Skalman 13y agoI understand it as 1.12<>2.2, and 1.13<>2.3 and so on. How is the link 1.(9+x).y<>2.x.y clearer than 1.(10+x).y<>2.x.y?