4 ms·
The problem I have with any of these types of rankings is always the basis, which is so nebulous that it never holds up under scrutiny. In this case, popularit
by jroseattle 13y ago
The problem I have with any of these types of rankings is always the basis, which is so nebulous that it never holds up under scrutiny.
In this case, popularity is measured in terms of the number of programmers using a language, the number of training courses, and the number of third-party vendors.
I use about 5 different languages on this list, and another 3-4 that aren't. Which group am I counted in?
Training courses = popularity? Hmm, maybe. That also represents a sales angle, so it's skewed. As pointed out elsewhere, Javascript is incredibly popular but I don't find a lot of training courses available for it. It must not be popular!
Third-party vendors? Guess it depends on what you're selling (again, sales skews the line.) Some languages don't formulate well to products being sold (think dynamic languages that can't be compiled/obscured).
And lastly, what purpose does a popularity list not driven by job descriptions serve?
- dragonwriter 13y ago> And lastly, what purpose does a popularity list not driven by job descriptions serve? The only purpose a popularity list driven by job descriptions serves is in determining the employability consequences of getting the language on your resume; every other conceivable purpose of a popularity list is best served by one not based on job descriptions.