3 ms·
That's a pretty unfair standard; no psychological statement is true of literally all humanity, and only someone very naive would try to generalize that broadly.
by saucetenuto 13y ago
That's a pretty unfair standard; no psychological statement is true of literally all humanity, and only someone very naive would try to generalize that broadly. I don't know the author at all, but I'm willing to give them that much credit.
Let me try to reframe his point in a way you might find more palatable. When you feel anger, it's an opportunity to learn something about yourself--an opportunity that most people ignore. You'll always feel like you have a good immediate reason to be angry because that's how emotion works, but those explanations are often retroactive and superficial; they don't point toward a change in the world that would make your anger go away. Projection one such failure mode, and a very common; so common, in fact, that many people would do well to check themselves for it every single time they feel anger. The author illustrates his point with a concrete example.
Perhaps none of this is useful to you personally. That's fine. But you aren't representative.
- Eliezer 13y agoOne counterexample can't outweigh a lot of positive examples, but we don't have verified positive examples of people making the reasoning error the OP claims - we don't have verified positive examples of people secretly thinking what OP claims they were secretly thinking. It seems to me that I went through the same thought processes that other people worried about FWS say they underwent, while being in an utterly different context from what OP is claiming to produce motivated cognition. That makes me extremely skeptical that OP is correct in trying to thus undermine the thought processes producing worry about FWS. In this case it's not clear that OP is successfully generalizing over any of humanity.