IANYL, but I'm not sure I buy the it's an "administrative fee" argument. First of all, the section that attempts to discount this random $0.61 as a supposed "f

IANYL, but I'm not sure I buy the it's an "administrative fee" argument. First of all, the section that attempts to discount this random $0.61 as a supposed "fee" is discussing whether or not AT&T will provide notice, not whether it constitutes a price increase. Second, at best, that sentence would mostly seem to be discussing only that AT&T doesn't consider this fee increase material, but that's not necessarily conclusive. Fact of the matter is that this is an increase in the amount due to the provider for the Service, so without the surcharge directly relating to some change in circumstances regarding the contract, I'd consider 1.3 applicable. AT&T's fees page basically tries to couch the Administrative Fee language in terms of some sort of mandatory obligation that AT&T is paying on behalf of its customers, but it's farcical: AT&T has to pay rents to operate its cell sites, that's the whole reason consumers contracted for the Services in the first place.