It's neutral at best. Failing to report on it would be very bad, but reporting on it isn't a particular mark of integrity. It seems the integrity is less impre

It's neutral at best. Failing to report on it would be very bad, but reporting on it isn't a particular mark of integrity. It seems the integrity is less impressive when the controversy is closer to home (the people running the failed DMI project and the journalistic ends of the BBC are likely to be very far removed from each other) - see the Pollard Report. http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/david-elstein/jimmy-savile-and-bbc-pollard-report http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/david-elstein/jimmy-sav...