3 ms·

Shocker. Protocol issues. Time for another extension! Or to just shoot X.org in the head and quell the FUD surrounding Wayland.

• _pmf_ 13y ago
  > Or to just shoot X.org in the head and quell the FUD surrounding Wayland. Yes, we should stop being so critical and automatically embrace everything new as much better than what came before it, due to being developed by agile superstar developers.
  • drivebyacct2 13y ago
    Are you kidding me? Or do you just make assumptions and accusations about technologies you don't know about? "Super star agile developers"? That's the best FUD you can put in my mouth? By the way, you might look up the "superstar" developers behind Wayland: Ctrl+F "The developers": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protocol) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protoco... ..... Huh, that's sure interesting. Nowhere did I imply that Wayland was better than X simply because it was newer. That's the exact kind of FUD I'm talking about from the X.org crowd that fears Mir and Wayland because they don't understand: the current technologies, the future technologies, the evolution of Wayland, the DEVELOPERS behind Wayland AND the HUGE list of flaws in X. Stop spreading uninformed FUD, do not put words in my mouth and don't accuse me of being a hipster.
    • pfortuny 13y ago
      This is not helping either of you or any of us. Stay clam, take some time out and reflect.