3 ms·
jQuery 1.9.1 + Underscore 1.4.4, minified and gzipped is 37,283 bytes. Angular.js 1.0.7 minified and gzipped is 30,254 bytes. So you're actually sending down
by defen 13y ago
jQuery 1.9.1 + Underscore 1.4.4, minified and gzipped is 37,283 bytes. Angular.js 1.0.7 minified and gzipped is 30,254 bytes. So you're actually sending down significantly less code for small projects if you're just using angular.
Furthermore, my experience has been the opposite of yours - I find myself writing far less glue/boilerplate code with angular.
- heidar 13y agoI'd be curious to see any large Angularjs apps. Do you know any? How big should single page apps be allowed to be? Is there a clear use case for this to be sensible? This is not a loaded question in case you or someone mistakes it for such...
- dested 13y agohttp://builtwith.angularjs.org/ http://builtwith.angularjs.org/
- adamnemecek 13y agoI would not call it a big app but 5by.com is written in some 2.2KLOC of angular and I feel like it shows some of the strength of the framework.
- abrkn 13y agoCode or it didn't happen
- defen 13y agoIt's clear that you're here to troll or to push an agenda, and not to learn. I personally do not care what technology you use. It's not my responsibility to convince you that your current practices are suboptimal. I'm not a contributor or in any other way affiliated with Angular, I just think it's a really well done framework.
- skore 13y agoI've downvoted a couple of your comments in this thread that were in a similar style. HN isn't reddit. Please educate yourself on the way discussions are conducted here.