3 ms·

None of this would benefit anyone other than Mr Dotcom. (Payback to who for what exactly?)

• pyre 13y ago
  The implication is that the tactics used against Kim Dotcom were done so at the behest of Hollywood pressuring the US government to 'do something,' who then in turn leaned on the NZ government to 'do something.' That's the Hollywood part of the comment. I guess the 'banks' part is because Kim's assets were frozen, but that's not the fault of the banks. There's no need for revenge against them.
  • tracker1 13y ago
    Kind of.. I actually spouted it off as a joke, but several people didn't like it apparently, or didn't see it as so. The Hollywood part is spot on... the bank part was me confusing some bits of the actions against wikileaks with kimdotcom/megaupload.
    • damncabbage 13y ago
      Sorry. I think was Poe's Law[1] in action again. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poes_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poes_law