3 ms·
>Or by "objective" do you actually mean the opposite You're being very snarky and assuming the worst in people's comments. Both samspenc and I meant what we sa
by rm999 13y ago
>Or by "objective" do you actually mean the opposite
You're being very snarky and assuming the worst in people's comments. Both samspenc and I meant what we said, as most people generally do. Seriously, you've been less civil than you may realize.
What do I mean by objective? You downvoted a comment that is actually pretty standard/common here ("I liked this article because X"). I can only imagine you acted this way because you are biased towards the topic; it's easy to deny you aren't, but you broke downvoting protocol either way. You're contributing to the stereotype of googlers acting badly in threads about google (my comments in this thread have been downvoted, something that virtually never happens to me on hackernews).
- endtime 13y ago>I can only imagine you acted this way because you are biased towards the topic This is exactly what I'm objecting to. >you broke downvoting protocol either way How did I break protocol if I am not (as you claim) lying?