4 ms·
I think this is simply a function of the perceived value of a story. If it doesn't have many upvotes, readers are unlikely to click on it, and therefore unlikel
by harpastum 18y ago
I think this is simply a function of the perceived value of a story. If it doesn't have many upvotes, readers are unlikely to click on it, and therefore unlikely to upvote themselves.
Likewise, if there has been no commentary on an article, a reader is much more likely to comment on the article's site or not at all, rather than try to force a discussion.
An interesting question branching off of this is the percentage of upvotes related to the number of votes for a story. That is, how does the ratio of visits to upvotes change as a story gains traction. In my own personal experience, I don't think there's much of a difference. The only way to know for sure is to get the stats from PG.
- christofd 18y agoTo clarify: I don't mean upvotes on the story but upvotes on comments (which is the 1. point). >Likewise, if there has been no commentary on an article, a >reader is much more likely to comment on the article's site >or not at all Unfortunately, this doesn't make sense logically. Comparing the speed of upvotes on the story vs. speed of upvotes on comments over time is interesting.