7 ms·

Neat idea! We'll be following along as we've found students do better with a bit more structure than this program provides, but there are so many ways of learni

Neat idea! We'll be following along as we've found students do better with a bit more structure than this program provides, but there are so many ways of learning it may work well. What I like most is the personal help. It promises not just a video but guidance to the best video based on where the "noob" is located... that's awesome. I would say that "passively by dropping comments to the blog" feels like a low bar (but maybe I'm reading too literally?). The response rates to questions must be prompt – the difference between getting an answer in 30 seconds and 10 minutes is huge for me, and I've been writing software for 15 years. It's only worse for beginners. For our students at Thinkful (http://www.thinkful.com/ http://www.thinkful.com/) getting human contact promptly is key... our students only like banging their heads against the wall for so many minutes before getting demotivated!

catchmrbharath 13y ago
> The response rates to questions must be prompt – the difference between getting an answer in 30 seconds and 10 minutes is huge for me, and I've been writing software for 15 years. It's only worse for beginners. I think the there is a lot of learning involved when you are trying to figure out an answer. If things are answered very quickly they won't try at all and ask the person, even though the answer is very simple.
- darrellsilver 13y ago
  I agree in the principle you're after (independence beats dependent on someone else) but not the method. Quick response rates help people feel not alone. And that's really really important because alone is too close to helpless is too close to powerless is too close to giving up. To develop independence you need a good teacher. That's one who helps you understand why the answer is the answer, rather than just gives you the answer. Teach a person to fish... basically.
  - imdsm 13y ago
    I agree with this. When I was first learning to code I was ten, and my mentor would show me the solution, and I would go 'aaaah I get it now', and then he's ask me if I really understood it, which I would sometimes reply with 'not really, no'. Copy paste compile, a terrible way to "learn".
  - deleted 13y ago
    [deleted]

catchmrbharath 13y ago

> The response rates to questions must be prompt – the difference between getting an answer in 30 seconds and 10 minutes is huge for me, and I've been writing software for 15 years. It's only worse for beginners. I think the there is a lot of learning involved when you are trying to figure out an answer. If things are answered very quickly they won't try at all and ask the person, even though the answer is very simple.

darrellsilver 13y ago
I agree in the principle you're after (independence beats dependent on someone else) but not the method. Quick response rates help people feel not alone. And that's really really important because alone is too close to helpless is too close to powerless is too close to giving up. To develop independence you need a good teacher. That's one who helps you understand why the answer is the answer, rather than just gives you the answer. Teach a person to fish... basically.
- imdsm 13y ago
  I agree with this. When I was first learning to code I was ten, and my mentor would show me the solution, and I would go 'aaaah I get it now', and then he's ask me if I really understood it, which I would sometimes reply with 'not really, no'. Copy paste compile, a terrible way to "learn".
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]