Feels a little ironic that the wrong image format is used in an article talking about the details of web design. In some of these pictures, both the "good" and

Feels a little ironic that the wrong image format is used in an article talking about the details of web design. In some of these pictures, both the "good" and "bad" fonts look bad to me, but I can't tell if it's because of the compression or not. In others, the "bad" font looks better to me, but I'm guessing this is because the "good" font was more aliased before it was compressed. The lower-contrast text examples also look blurrier than the high-contrast ones. Images with relatively few colors (like pictures of text) should be stored as PNG, especially if being able to pore over the details is important. This might be a good article with a good point (I don't know much about typefaces), but I feel like the examples really work against the article.