3 ms·
I agree that the app is disgusting however I disagree that the post is off-topic. The article questions the iTunes App Store approval process and brings to att
by jasongullickson 18y ago
I agree that the app is disgusting however I disagree that the post is off-topic.
The article questions the iTunes App Store approval process and brings to attention this particularly striking example. It raises questions about censorship, taste and free speech. All things I believe HN readers find interesting.
The disappointing thing for me is that I had considered working with a child-abuse prevention agency to develop an application which simulates the effect of shaken baby syndrome (similar to physical dolls which do the same) as a tool for educators, physicians, law enforcement officers, etc.
Now the chances of such an app being approved are most likely zero.
- bitdiddle 18y agoI'm curious as to what you think the censorship/free speech issue is? A corporation can choose not to sell disgusting products without raising free speech issues. Isn't this just a matter of choice?
- jasongullickson 18y agoYou're correct in the sense that it is not a Constitutional issue when a company chooses to do this; but that doesn't mean it's not limiting the act of free speech.