3 ms·

So it is OK for people to live there (health-wise) but not OK for people to stay there temporarily? I mean, if there are 200 people in a building and it burns d

So it is OK for people to live there (health-wise) but not OK for people to stay there temporarily? I mean, if there are 200 people in a building and it burns down does it really matter if they were there temporarily or permanently? Bizarre. The only way justification I could see is that if it were not hygienic, there is a chance of a outbreak of a virus happening (but that is no different than the metro or a flea market).

pavel_lishin 13y ago
> * if there are 200 people in a building and it burns down does it really matter if they were there temporarily or permanently?* It absolutely matters, and your scenario is a very serious one. Permanent residents know where the fire exits are, and which hallways are dead-ends. Temporary residents may not even be aware which windows open onto a fire escape.
- robrenaud 13y ago
  Given that deaths by fire in NYC were in a record low in 2012, when AirBNB rentals in NYC were presumably at a record high, maybe the lack of fire regulations aren't actually that big a risk. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/nyregion/58-fire-deaths-in-new-york-city-in-2012-record-low.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/nyregion/58-fire-deaths-in...