3 ms·
My general libertarian bent generally would lead me to hate this sort of legislation, but in markets where housing is near max utilization, it's not only desira
by homosaur 13y ago
My general libertarian bent generally would lead me to hate this sort of legislation, but in markets where housing is near max utilization, it's not only desirable, it's necessary. We already have enough of an issue with housing in places like NYC and SF without landlords turning apartment buildings into shitty hotels full of vacationers and Spring Break types who do not care the slightest for the condition of the property or their relationship with neighbors.
- drcode 13y agoNIMBY
- paddy_m 13y agoThe reason there isn't enough housing, in SF especially is government intervention. Zoning laws prevent housing supply meeting demand.
- sigil 13y agoI've heard SF's laws against denser housing are a major factor in the housing "shortage" there. [1] In NYC, rent control laws are a major factor in the artificial housing shortage. There's a consensus across economists of all stripes that rent control is a bad thing ("the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city -- except for bombing"). See the studies cited here. [2] [1] http://pandodaily.com/2012/12/01/san-francisco-can-become-a-world-capital-first-it-needs-to-get-over-itself/ http://pandodaily.com/2012/12/01/san-francisco-can-become-a-... [2] http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html
- lukasb 13y agoWhat you say about rent control is true - if there are not restrictions on building new housing. This is almost never true.
- namdnay 13y agoThe question is: Would SF be as popular without zoning laws? If there were 50 story towers in the middle of the painted ladies, would it still be SF? Or maybe I'm confusing zoning regulations with other codes.