3 ms·
This doesn't solve the key distribution problem at all: To start off, both Alice and Bob must have their own slabs of diffusing glass and must physically meet
by rosser 13y ago
This doesn't solve the key distribution problem at all:
To start off, both Alice and Bob must have their own slabs of diffusing glass and must physically meet to create a key for encoding a message later.
Like any other OTP system, key distribution — ensuring that the parties who wish to communicate securely have a shared secret (or secrets in the case of OTP; the whole point of OTP is that a key is only used once) — is the weak point. Unlike many other OTP systems, this one requires a physical meeting, which, depending on your use-case for needing crypto in the first place, may be impossible, or deadly dangerous.
At best, this complicates key compromise.
EDIT: clarifying language.
- _red 13y agoCorrect, I can't see the practical use of this. If Alice and Bob must have a secure method to jointly compute K(A) ⊕ K(B), then why wouldn't then use that same method to just exchange the data?
- dsr_ 13y agoAt the time of their key-exchange meeting, they don't know what messages they will want to exchange later.