4 ms·
The original design, years in the making, was based on batteries that would never catch fire. They have moved from never catch fire, in a period of a few month
by jerrya 13y ago
The original design, years in the making, was based on batteries that would never catch fire.
They have moved from never catch fire, in a period of a few months, to batteries they hope will not catch fire, with features to enable survivability should a battery catch fire.
If this new design is appropriate, that earlier design was engineering malpractice.
I doubt this design would be the outcome of the same Boeing design engineering effort without the get it to market time constraint. Just like when a web service goes down mysteriously and the engineers desire is to take it down and debug it and the required response is to patch it, and get her flying again. But I wouldn't term that "design" or "engineered".
- ajross 13y ago"Malpractice" seems like a loaded word chosen more for debate impact than suitability. We can certainly agree that the original design was wrong (or "mistaken" if you want to load it on the other side). Isn't that enough?
- jerrya 13y agoI honestly don't know. I am hard put to explain what malpractice might be for a lawyer or doctor that wouldn't be the same for the largest US manufacturer of aircraft and her engineers. This was a huge mistake, and it seemed as though they should've known.