4 ms·
You're not paying $100/month for the machine. You're paying $100/month for management, and paying $300 for a server is a waste of $300. I admit, it's been a w
by ethomson 13y ago
You're not paying $100/month for the machine. You're paying $100/month for management, and paying $300 for a server is a waste of $300.
I admit, it's been a while since I've done any systems administration myself, but I wouldn't even trust my personal blog to a $300 machine. I'm not even sure I'd trust a $300 rackmount chassis.
When I start to think about colocating my own server - and thus being the one responsible for its maintenance - I immediately think of redundant everything. That means RAID. That means dual, redundant, hot swappable power supplies. That might mean two machines.
Because even if I live in the metro area that I'm colocating in, me driving in to get physical access to the machine means downtime. And that assumes that I have exactly what I need to restore that machine on-hand. (I probably don't.)
And these are things that I'd rather pay somebody else to deal with.