How does this not violate several Constitutional amendments? Unexplained solitary confinement sounds like cruel and unusual punishment, and not allowing his law

How does this not violate several Constitutional amendments? Unexplained solitary confinement sounds like cruel and unusual punishment, and not allowing his lawyer to see him is clearly a denial of fair representation. I'm not sure about the legality of the diet, but maybe someone more informed on prison law could step in. Rooming him with terrorists and gang members? Denying entry for a woman not wearing a bra? (which, in addition to making no sense, is also creepy) This is clear abuse of state power, and I don't understand how people aren't outraged over it. But then again, the state effectively owns the media, so there's yet another obstacle in Weev's path. In a word: disgusting.