5 ms·

It's a bummer, but it isn't the CoVim authors' fault that the Gobby developers chose irrelevance. http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=blob;f=COPYING;h=b124cf5

It's a bummer, but it isn't the CoVim authors' fault that the Gobby developers chose irrelevance. http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=blob;f=COPYING;h=b124cf581250c210960185e8fbf6c967a0538721;hb=HEAD http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=blob;f=COPYING;h=b124c...

codys 13y ago
I don't understand. You've linked to a copy of the LGPLv2.1 in infininote's git repo. Are you saying that their choice of licence primarily caused their product to be less popular?
- benatkin 13y ago
  No, I'm saying that it precludes it from being an obvious choice for a standard, since implementing that type of protocol isn't simple and there are editor writers who don't want to integrate LGPL code.
  - qu4z-2 13y ago
    Surely if it's LGPL you can just link against it, no?
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]