4 ms·

Too bad it doesn't use the Infinote protocol just like Gobby [1] and Gedit. That way, everyone could use their own editor while working on the same document. [

Too bad it doesn't use the Infinote protocol just like Gobby [1] and Gedit. That way, everyone could use their own editor while working on the same document. [1] http://gobby.0x539.de/ http://gobby.0x539.de/

benatkin 13y ago
It's a bummer, but it isn't the CoVim authors' fault that the Gobby developers chose irrelevance. http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=blob;f=COPYING;h=b124cf581250c210960185e8fbf6c967a0538721;hb=HEAD http://git.0x539.de/?p=infinote.git;a=blob;f=COPYING;h=b124c...
- codys 13y ago
  I don't understand. You've linked to a copy of the LGPLv2.1 in infininote's git repo. Are you saying that their choice of licence primarily caused their product to be less popular?
  - benatkin 13y ago
    No, I'm saying that it precludes it from being an obvious choice for a standard, since implementing that type of protocol isn't simple and there are editor writers who don't want to integrate LGPL code.
    - qu4z-2 13y ago
      Surely if it's LGPL you can just link against it, no?
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]