2 ms·
cool. Yeah, I'm assuming whoever wants the drive is prepared to use electron microscopes and such to uncover the bits on the mangled wreckage. So the question i
by niels_olson 18y ago
cool. Yeah, I'm assuming whoever wants the drive is prepared to use electron microscopes and such to uncover the bits on the mangled wreckage. So the question isn't just a informational entropy question, but a physical entropy question. How much physical entropy does Gutmann 35 pass (or n passes) add to the disk?
Basically, somebody asked a listserv what was the best way to securely wipe a hard drive. I said Gutmann 35 pass, and others came back with ideas for thermite, shooting it, etc. I figured, compared to Gutmann, thermite (the most exothermic chemical reaction, and one that happens to use iron) would be the closest. But I got to thinking, you know, if that thermite just blasts, then you've still got fragments and Gutmann wins. If it's a smoldering sort of thing and you have plenty of oxygen, maybe thermite wins, but how much thermite would you need, and how would you have to do it?
So I guess a better question would be what's the minimum necessary chemical reaction to equal the entropy of a 35 pass Gutmann?
- _pius 18y agoIn practice, the best way to handle a drive that might actually need to be resistant to that level of analysis is to degauss the drive, shred it, and then melt it down in an incinerator. You wouldn't mess around with Gutmann at all because it's just a poor man's degauss, used for situations when you don't want to risk damage to the drive. You wouldn't just detonate the drive either because, as you mentioned, individual pieces could potentially still have recoverable data.