4 ms·

I would be happy to try this out and to pay your entirely reasonable yearly fee if I like it, but only if you provide a local login option that doesn't rely on

I would be happy to try this out and to pay your entirely reasonable yearly fee if I like it, but only if you provide a local login option that doesn't rely on google, facebook or twitter. I hate tying services to my other accounts, and I'm not making an exception for you. Not trying to be difficult, just letting you know the reality: tying login to other services loses you customers.

hamburglar 13y ago
Note also that because of this, I still haven't been able to see what the service is even like, because there is no demo.
- CrazedGeek 13y ago
  Is the form under the social signup buttons not a 'local' signup?
  - meister 13y ago
    It creates a local account, no need for a social account.
    - hamburglar 13y ago
      Did you add this after the original post or am I just blind? Anyway, signed up and trying it out! Can you comment on the status of the interface on mobile browsers / using touch?
      - meister 13y ago
        Local sign up was there since the beginning ^^ We use some responsive design for screen size. I have to optimize some UI action for tablets and mobiles. We will maybe publish a mobile app if customers ask for it.
      - deleted 13y ago
        [deleted]
ishansharma 13y ago
I do exactly opposite. I prefer to tie services with my Google/FB account so that I don't have to remember too many passwords. And with recent security breaches, if I'm letting every other App store my information on their server (password etc.), isn't that less secure? I am just curious why people in general(nothing personal) don't tie their accounts.
- baruch 13y ago
  I use PwdHash ( https://www.pwdhash.com/ https://www.pwdhash.com/ ) to obfuscate my password for me based on the site url so that I only need to remember one password and yet not fear when it gets leaked from one hacked server. There is a browser extension and a mobile app as well to make it super easy to use. There is one site I use that defeats this by using several hosts for its login, one dedicated to login and another on the main site.

hamburglar 13y ago

Note also that because of this, I still haven't been able to see what the service is even like, because there is no demo.

CrazedGeek 13y ago
Is the form under the social signup buttons not a 'local' signup?
- meister 13y ago
  It creates a local account, no need for a social account.
  - hamburglar 13y ago
    Did you add this after the original post or am I just blind? Anyway, signed up and trying it out! Can you comment on the status of the interface on mobile browsers / using touch?
    - meister 13y ago
      Local sign up was there since the beginning ^^ We use some responsive design for screen size. I have to optimize some UI action for tablets and mobiles. We will maybe publish a mobile app if customers ask for it.
    - deleted 13y ago
      [deleted]

ishansharma 13y ago

I do exactly opposite. I prefer to tie services with my Google/FB account so that I don't have to remember too many passwords. And with recent security breaches, if I'm letting every other App store my information on their server (password etc.), isn't that less secure? I am just curious why people in general(nothing personal) don't tie their accounts.

baruch 13y ago
I use PwdHash ( https://www.pwdhash.com/ https://www.pwdhash.com/ ) to obfuscate my password for me based on the site url so that I only need to remember one password and yet not fear when it gets leaked from one hacked server. There is a browser extension and a mobile app as well to make it super easy to use. There is one site I use that defeats this by using several hosts for its login, one dedicated to login and another on the main site.