4 ms·
I thought this was obvious? Amazon's Cloudfront on the other hand is a CDN and works great :)
by davidandgoliath 13y ago
I thought this was obvious? Amazon's Cloudfront on the other hand is a CDN and works great :)
- jdorfman 13y ago@davidandgoliath you would think so. But a lot of companies ignore it.
- davidandgoliath 13y agoYou also seem to have ignored it in your post, any reason you didn't test cloudfront?
- jdorfman 13y ago@davidandgoliath I work for MaxCDN so I would probably get fired. =P
- marceldegraaf 13y agoWhy would you get fired for covering an obvious and well-known CDN alternative in your blog post? Honestly interested :-)
- jonny_eh 13y agoBecause it's not in his or his company's best interest? I bet that Cloudfront's performance isn't too different from MaxCDN's.
- mathrawka 13y agoSo you post something that basically compares apples and oranges? Honestly, this post turns me off from MaxCDN.
- corin_ 13y agoAgreed. Especially if he was well aware that AWS offers a comparative service, but instead chose to compare to a different one.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- asb 13y agoIf only Route53 allowed you to point the apex domain at Cloudfront (as I understand it, it's currently S3 or ELB).
- tzury 13y agoYou may not want to do so as: 1) POST (and so are PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS and CONNECT) are not yet supported on CloudFront. 2) HTTPS/SSL for your own domain is not yet supported on CloudFront.