4 ms·
If I were a Yahoo shareholder, even at a $1.1bn price tag, I would vote against the acquisition. > Tumblr has no real revenue, let alone profit, making it a va
by antr 13y ago
If I were a Yahoo shareholder, even at a $1.1bn price tag, I would vote against the acquisition.
> Tumblr has no real revenue, let alone profit, making it a value dilutive acquisition for Yahoo.
> The acquisition price is artificially being inflated by investors who are trying to squeeze Yahoo, who is trying to "turnaround" its profitable business. The $1.1.bn price is already "too high" for Tumblr's true underlying value.
> Yahoo has no track-record of successfully acquiring, integrating and generating value from such acquisitions. Broadcast.com ($5.7bn), GeoCities ($3.6bn), Inktomi ($235m), Overture ($1.6bn), del.icio.us ($20m), Flickr ($?m), and the list goes on.
I feel sorry for Yahoo's retail investors. I guess "greed is good" when it comes to startup acquisitions.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- nightmann 13y ago> The acquisition price is artificially being inflated by investors who are trying to squeeze Yahoo, who is trying to "turnaround" its profitable business. The $1.1.bn price is already "too high" for Tumblr's true underlying value. That's the market. If Yahoo thinks tumblr is worth $1.1B, then Yahoo will pay $1.1B; if not, then they won't. How the price got there (by some artificial inflation or whatever) is irrelevant. > Yahoo has no track-record of successfully acquiring, integrating and generating value from such acquisitions. Broadcast.com ($5.7bn), GeoCities ($3.6bn), Inktomi ($235m), Overture ($1.6bn), del.icio.us ($20m), Flickr ($?m), and the list goes on. All the acquisitions cited are 8+ years old. And it is hard to say whether the recent acquisitions (within the past, say, 5 years) are doing well or not. (I would also vote against the acquisition, but for other reasons)