4 ms·
Which is exactly why that passage confined itself to talking about constant motion.
by breadbox 13y ago
Which is exactly why that passage confined itself to talking about constant motion.
- shardling 13y agoBut the argument you used would seem to apply to both of those thing. That's what makes it flawed -- you claim it is obvious, when in fact this line of argument is very subtle and often misleads laymen. (Notice that in this very thread there seem to be people who think you couldn't detect acceleration.)