> Every argument is trivial to win if you first convert your opponent into Mecha-Hitler. The problem with this metaphor is that Mecha-Hitler's early studies we

> Every argument is trivial to win if you first convert your opponent into Mecha-Hitler. The problem with this metaphor is that Mecha-Hitler's early studies were in rhetoric and formal logic, making him a skilled opponent in arguments of all kinds. It was only later, after the infamous radiation-and-remechanization incident during which his personality module was irreparably damaged, that his resulting monstrous disfigurements led people to believe him a simpleton, easily defeated in arguments. But I suspect that what people are concerned about regarding Google is whether it's best represented by the powerful and happy-go-lucky pre-incident Mecha-Hitler or by the powerful and scheming post-incident Mecha-Hitler. Without examining the personality module, how can you tell for sure?