I think you'll always get that in the pop psych pieces; they'll always always try to reach some eye-catching conclusion title to pull people in. I haven't read

I think you'll always get that in the pop psych pieces; they'll always always try to reach some eye-catching conclusion title to pull people in. I haven't read the original paper, but I highly doubt they made a case for causation unless the statistics backed it up; and if the stats did back it up, then the science does in fact say causation and not just correlation. It would be interesting to check.