Thank you so much for this absolutely awesome reply. The thing is: I totally agree with what you say, also definitely on what should be done next, e.g. defining

Thank you so much for this absolutely awesome reply. The thing is: I totally agree with what you say, also definitely on what should be done next, e.g. defining structure. I dont' believe in "the battle of armchairs". I would rather do philosophy in the same way we develop software: iteratively, MVP, POC…. That's why I put up a couple of ideas as an experiment. And your answer already proves that in a small way I was right! Thank you. – I will do as you advised and develop these thoughts in a iterative way. Regarding the domains: I personally think that Metaethics is among the most important intellectual subjects of the future. If you understand why and under what condition people consider stuff good or evil, you can predict how people behave in minor and major scale, what makes them go to war or buy products. Metaethics is too important to leave it to philosophers who mostly are clueless about math, software or the scientific method. And that is why I a) reach out to hackers, and b) have reserved the domains. Again, thank you. Your answer alone has made this little experiment a success. :-)