4 ms·
> Surely something more is needed to make it immoral. Depends what you mean by immoral. A moral consequentialist might argue that negative externalities (like
by SEMW 13y ago
> Surely something more is needed to make it immoral.
Depends what you mean by immoral.
A moral consequentialist might argue that negative externalities (like pollution) are inherently immoral - though that doesn't necessarily mean every activity with negative externalities is necessarily immoral, since its positive consequences might outweigh that.
- icebraining 13y agoSure, but I'm not trying to define an absolute moral rule (I don't think the concept even makes sense), I'm arguing with threeseed on what s/he thinks is immoral.