4 ms·
As I learned from billnguyen's post, you can make it change the number of columns by zooming in and out. With the 3 column layout your mind immediately gives up
by thebear 13y ago
As I learned from billnguyen's post, you can make it change the number of columns by zooming in and out. With the 3 column layout your mind immediately gives up on wanting to figure out the chronological order. Am I the only one who thinks that the chronology matters?
- jack-r-abbit 13y agozoom in and out? I don't see that option in G+. And I very much care that things are in order. I can't understand random (or even a complex, non random, non time-based order). This is shit.
- thebear 13y agoWe meant zooming in the browser, using C+ and C-. And yes, I agree with the s--t part.
- billnguyen 13y agono, but its pretty apparent that the G+ team doesn't think it matters. 3 columns just helps my brain get on that same wavelength, whether I agree with it or not :)
- thebear 13y agoI think you nailed it there: they obviously don't think that chronological order matters, and so much for that.
- billnguyen 13y ago@jack-r-abbit: its just a setting in your browser, chrome makes it sticky so once you set it for your google+ page you should always see it zoomed in/out to your setting
- jack-r-abbit 13y agooh.. ya I know how to zoom my browser. But that is gross. By the time I zoom enough to get two columns... everything is freaking huge. I'm not blind... I just don't want random sized blocks randomly thrown onto the page.
- billnguyen 13y agoif you want single column theres an option under More called Steam Layout
- jack-r-abbit 13y agoYou, sir, are a hero.
- thebear 13y agoThat's brilliant (irony directed at Google, not billnguyen, whose posts are great).
- tomkarlo 13y agoFacebook's stream hasn't been chronological (for most users) in a long time - I think years, and it doesn't seem to bother most users.
- jack-r-abbit 13y agoMine is. They do reset the sort order back to "top stories" once in awhile which is annoying but I always just set it back to sort by date
- k-mcgrady 13y agoYes but the majority or people just use the top stories sort and are happy with it. I think people who want everything in chronological order are the type of people who don't want to miss a post - even though most posts on Facebook/Google + aren't important enough to matter if you miss them.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- jack-r-abbit 13y agoI want things in chronological order so I can tell if I have missed any post. But that doesn't mean I need to read every post. I do want to be able to decide for myself from the list what I view as a "top story". So I have them sort by date. and when I've scrolled back to something I know I've seen then I don't need to keep scrolling back. When things are random, I get stuff I've already seen mixed in with new stuff. That is not a very good user experience IMO.
- ryanmolden 13y agoActually I suspect a not insignificant number of people aren't even aware of Facebook's edge-rank shenanigans. I have lost count of the number of times I have had to point out, even to techy friends, that you can reset the sort to most recent (over and over, thanks Facebook). This normally comes after people complaining they didn't see some post or another from a friend/family member, because Facebook decided it wasn't "popular" enough. Then again most of my friends are the kind that only friend actual friends, if they had feeds 800 people deep I suspect Facebook culling most posts would be appreciated. The only thing that annoys me is constantly having to reset it, you'd think after N times they would take the signal of "your edge-rank trimming is abysmal", but no.