The original worry was not over that the evidence of her actions might be used against her, it was that they might be used without the context, presumably by an

The original worry was not over that the evidence of her actions might be used against her, it was that they might be used without the context, presumably by an algorithm or a mindless HR drone. If you go through the trouble of hiring someone, you'll have the context. I can't immediately think of a job where it'd reasonable count against her, but it's not inconceivable that a such could exist - and if it did, she'd be wrong to withhold it.