6 ms·

>YouTube wants viewers, regardless of which platform they're coming from. Then why don't they make an Windows Phone YouTube app and show ads on it? Hell, show

>YouTube wants viewers, regardless of which platform they're coming from. Then why don't they make an Windows Phone YouTube app and show ads on it? Hell, show double the ads just to annoy WP users. Or are they afraid that it will hurt Android?

bishnu 13y ago
My guess is, [expected revenue per user] * [expected number of Windows Mobile users] - [cost to build a decent YouTube app] is a negative number.
- nivla 13y ago
  Yet they have an official chrome browser app for Windows 8.
  - josh2600 13y ago
    Youtube is considered core mobile functionality, like a browser, but Youtube is a fiefdom in which Google does not have to compete (unlike the ultra-competitive landscape of the Browser wars). While Google has nothing to lose and everything to gain from restricting access to YouTube, the same cannot be said about the Browser, thus they compete. It's simple economics; don't waste money helping people dethrone your monopoly (I AM NOT ADVOCATING THIS POSITION, SIMPLY STATING MY PERCEPTION).
  - eddieroger 13y ago
    Yeah, it shares a codebase with the Windows 7 version if it's different at all. The number of Windows 7 + Windows 8 installs is far greater than Windows Phone users.
- jbigelow76 13y ago
  What a crock. Google has many legit reasons to not want to build an app for a competing platform, so be it. But to think a company that routinely throws money away on tons of other development efforts while letting search ad revenue subsidize the cost would suddenly start doing a cost/benefit analysis of such a trivial effort is absurd. If your formula was applied to other products, like Google Reader which was never monetized and had huge infrastructure costs, they never would have seen the light of day. This is a strategic stance on Google's part, not financial, nothing wrong with that.
- ankitml 13y ago
  that is a naive world view. Google has never viewed its product with such simplicity. THey are created and destroyed by a vision (sometimes bad vision, most time good vision) (sometimes in good competitive spirit, sometimes in the view of stifling competition).
lawdawg 13y ago
Same reason the vast majority of devs do not make a WP app, or release a crappy version 2 years later.
- CloudNine 13y ago
  Even Vimeo can make a decent Windows Phone app and a Windows 8 app and Youtube with a order of magnitude more revenue cannot? If you really believe that, I have a bridge to sell. Give me a break, Google is doing this to hurt the adoption of Windows Phone.
  - lawdawg 13y ago
    > Google is doing this to hurt the adoption of Windows Phone. If you really believe that, I have a bridge to sell ... after I stop laughing.
    - CloudNine 13y ago
      I'll be laughing longer at you at simplistically believing Google's lame excuse for the lack of a WP app that so many people are using Windows Phone that it's affecting Youtube's ad revenue because of not showing ads to them, but at the same time it's not worth monetizing the very same eyeballs by making an official YouTube app and showing ads to the Windows Phone audience.
    - lawdawg 13y ago
      @CloudNine WP users can access YouTube videos, the only difference is whether its through an official app or their web browser. So yes, it does matter a lot to them that these eyes are no longer seeing ads that they previously would have. Google has obviously determined that WPs tiny marketshare isn't enough to justify creating a native app when the browser will work decently enough. Thinking otherwise is just ... idiotic. Yes, Google is making a big deal out of this when apps like MetroTube already do the same thing. The difference here is its Microsoft, a huge company who has gone out of its way to sling shit on Google, instead of 2 dudes from NZ.

bishnu 13y ago

My guess is, [expected revenue per user] * [expected number of Windows Mobile users] - [cost to build a decent YouTube app] is a negative number.

nivla 13y ago
Yet they have an official chrome browser app for Windows 8.
- josh2600 13y ago
  Youtube is considered core mobile functionality, like a browser, but Youtube is a fiefdom in which Google does not have to compete (unlike the ultra-competitive landscape of the Browser wars). While Google has nothing to lose and everything to gain from restricting access to YouTube, the same cannot be said about the Browser, thus they compete. It's simple economics; don't waste money helping people dethrone your monopoly (I AM NOT ADVOCATING THIS POSITION, SIMPLY STATING MY PERCEPTION).
- eddieroger 13y ago
  Yeah, it shares a codebase with the Windows 7 version if it's different at all. The number of Windows 7 + Windows 8 installs is far greater than Windows Phone users.
jbigelow76 13y ago
What a crock. Google has many legit reasons to not want to build an app for a competing platform, so be it. But to think a company that routinely throws money away on tons of other development efforts while letting search ad revenue subsidize the cost would suddenly start doing a cost/benefit analysis of such a trivial effort is absurd. If your formula was applied to other products, like Google Reader which was never monetized and had huge infrastructure costs, they never would have seen the light of day. This is a strategic stance on Google's part, not financial, nothing wrong with that.
ankitml 13y ago
that is a naive world view. Google has never viewed its product with such simplicity. THey are created and destroyed by a vision (sometimes bad vision, most time good vision) (sometimes in good competitive spirit, sometimes in the view of stifling competition).

lawdawg 13y ago

Same reason the vast majority of devs do not make a WP app, or release a crappy version 2 years later.

CloudNine 13y ago
Even Vimeo can make a decent Windows Phone app and a Windows 8 app and Youtube with a order of magnitude more revenue cannot? If you really believe that, I have a bridge to sell. Give me a break, Google is doing this to hurt the adoption of Windows Phone.
- lawdawg 13y ago
  > Google is doing this to hurt the adoption of Windows Phone. If you really believe that, I have a bridge to sell ... after I stop laughing.
  - CloudNine 13y ago
    I'll be laughing longer at you at simplistically believing Google's lame excuse for the lack of a WP app that so many people are using Windows Phone that it's affecting Youtube's ad revenue because of not showing ads to them, but at the same time it's not worth monetizing the very same eyeballs by making an official YouTube app and showing ads to the Windows Phone audience.
  - lawdawg 13y ago
    @CloudNine WP users can access YouTube videos, the only difference is whether its through an official app or their web browser. So yes, it does matter a lot to them that these eyes are no longer seeing ads that they previously would have. Google has obviously determined that WPs tiny marketshare isn't enough to justify creating a native app when the browser will work decently enough. Thinking otherwise is just ... idiotic. Yes, Google is making a big deal out of this when apps like MetroTube already do the same thing. The difference here is its Microsoft, a huge company who has gone out of its way to sling shit on Google, instead of 2 dudes from NZ.