4 ms·
Thoughts as they come to me: 1. If I'm spamming for a job, I'm basically just throwing darts. Why would I pay to contact one particular person? Surely there ar
by DanielStraight 13y ago
Thoughts as they come to me:
1. If I'm spamming for a job, I'm basically just throwing darts. Why would I pay to contact one particular person? Surely there are still plenty of people who aren't using your system that I can spam for free.
2. If the person in question is someone you actually respect (and are not just spamming), then the question is whether your offer is truly interesting and how good you are at pitching it, not how much you're willing to pay to be heard. I mean, if I wanted to contact Bret Victor, I would ask myself whether I actually had something worth saying to him, not whether he'd take $10 or $50 or $100. If I actually had something worth saying, I'd imagine his response would depend on my ability to make the value clear, not a bribe.
3. Celebrities asking for money directly from the public is just bad PR. I can't see any celebrity doing this.
4. Business luminaries selling conversations is already a thriving business: it's called consulting.
- tjr 13y agoSome celebrities charge money for autographs; I can imagine them charging money to personally respond to an email. We've already seen some well-known business people auction off a lunch meeting for charity; something similar might be plausible with email conversations.
- downandout 13y agoWhich is why I ask these things; I come up with ideas and see no downsides. Now I see plenty of them. Although, you are uncharacteristic this as a bribe. It's a way to reduce the number of spammy emails that in-demand people receive. Also, a third party service that charges and has the ability to get emails to celebrities isn't exactly "a celebrity asking the public for money".