2 ms·
I appreciate the attempt at an analogy but it fails here because of the agreement to the TOS. Both parties agreed to the etsy TOS which spells out, quite clearl
by ScottWhigham 13y ago
I appreciate the attempt at an analogy but it fails here because of the agreement to the TOS. Both parties agreed to the etsy TOS which spells out, quite clearly, what each's responsibilities are. So yes, Brendan has rights afforded/accorded by the TOS - and those are enforceable rights were he to choose to go that route.
- glesica 13y agoSharecroppers had rights, too. But when one party can cut off the other party's livelihood, it essentially suppresses the technical "rights" of the second party. Every American has a "right" to a fair trial. But it is well-documented that if you can't afford a decent lawyer, "fair" becomes an unfortunately flexible concept.