>I said they were a pain in the ass for the kinds of programs many people want to write And refuse to specify what those kinds of programs might be. You are i

>I said they were a pain in the ass for the kinds of programs many people want to write And refuse to specify what those kinds of programs might be. You are inventing a "many" and giving them a problem to create a false impression of consensus, when it is actually just you making a singular, baseless assertion. >the very fact that a community exists around these products should make that clear to you. I address that in the first post. You keep responding purely to act like a petulant child, but provide absolutely nothing to support your claims. Do you really think that makes you appear to be the rational, logical party?