3 ms·
> Huh? Why do you think it is appropriate for the US government to be regulating the behavior of a foreign bank in a foreign country? That's quite the straw ma
by milkshakes 13y ago
> Huh? Why do you think it is appropriate for the US government to be regulating the behavior of a foreign bank in a foreign country?
That's quite the straw man you've set up. I don't believe I ever once said anything like that.
I do think it is appropriate for the US to regulate the operations of a foreign bank within their boarders. If the multinational bank violated US law, the multinational bank and its US subsidiaries should lose their ability to continue to conduct business in the US. You know, like what DHS is doing to Mt Gox now, which was the whole point of this thread in the first place.
- trevelyan 13y ago> That's quite the straw man you've set up. I don't believe I ever once said anything like that. Huh? Your post goes on and on accusing HSBC Mexico of malfeasance yet does not contain a single accusation of wrongdoing on the part of any American subsidiary or company. As far the MtGox issue goes, DHS has shut down an American account belonging to an American company (a subsidiary explicitly created in the US to process USD). It is an entirely different matter.
- milkshakes 13y agoSeriously, RTFD. The document outlines in unambiguous terms the extent to which HSBC (the parent HSBC) consistently, knowingly, and over an extended period of time, manipulated transactions and associated processes, at times over the objections of their own US subsidiaries, to conduct business, in America, in US Dollars, that was in violation of AML laws and regulations. I'm not sure what else there's left to say about this at this point.