3 ms·

> You didn't say anything about "many people find". You said they are a pain in the ass I said they were a pain in the ass for the kinds of programs many peopl

> You didn't say anything about "many people find". You said they are a pain in the ass I said they were a pain in the ass for the kinds of programs many people want to write. I'm sorry you're too ignorant to grok my meaning without it being explained to you like a five year old child. > Those are both assertions, and you supported neither of them. They are self evident facts and don't require supporting evidence; the very fact that a community exists around these products should make that clear to you. In any case, it's absolutely clear there's no value in conversing with you, good day.

papsosouid 14y ago
>I said they were a pain in the ass for the kinds of programs many people want to write And refuse to specify what those kinds of programs might be. You are inventing a "many" and giving them a problem to create a false impression of consensus, when it is actually just you making a singular, baseless assertion. >the very fact that a community exists around these products should make that clear to you. I address that in the first post. You keep responding purely to act like a petulant child, but provide absolutely nothing to support your claims. Do you really think that makes you appear to be the rational, logical party?