5 ms·
You're the "almost" in "almost exclusively". I am too. When I was younger, I had more time than money, I travelled many a long hour in "cattle class", but I ha
by mseebach 13y ago
You're the "almost" in "almost exclusively". I am too.
When I was younger, I had more time than money, I travelled many a long hour in "cattle class", but I have some pretty awesome experiences to show for it. These days, I've got less time, but much more money, so I'll spend it for more comfort - but I'd be a damn hypocrite if I wanted airlines to do any less than their best to make sure young people of today can get the same experiences.
- Nursie 13y agoTrue, true, necessary travel is necessary and unnecessary travel is worthwhile and a broadening experience and definitely to be recommended. Pricing it out of mass market reach would be a bad thing. I guess to get food that isn't just crap you need to pick your airline. Singapore aren't too awful, and Delta's chicken salad the other week on my ATL->LHR flight was perfectly OK, but that seems the exception rather than the rule. I listened to a Radio 4 documentary on airline food the other week which was quite interesting. It revealed, amongst other things, that on many airlines there is a budget of roughly £1 ($1.50) per passenger per meal, which goes some way to explaining the hopelessly poor quality. And no, having travelled business class on a number of occasions, that old line "your taste buds are affected by the pressure" has never worked on me...
- mseebach 13y agoTo get food that isn't crap, you need to eat a good meal at the airport, for longer flights bring a sandwich. For all their faults, I love London airports for the ubiquity of Pret shops.
- Nursie 13y agoHehe. If it's a morning flight I like to start the day with a plate of smoked salmon and scrambled eggs, and a large glass of Sauvignon Blanc. For this they charge an arm and a leg but it makes the whole thing just that bit nicer...