3 ms·
I don't think capitalism is necessarily bad, and it's certainly better than Soviet-style (pseudo-)socialism. Meritocratic capitalism I'd favor strongly. The pr
by michaelochurch 13y ago
I don't think capitalism is necessarily bad, and it's certainly better than Soviet-style (pseudo-)socialism.
Meritocratic capitalism I'd favor strongly. The problem is this who-you-know corporate capitalism based on conformity rather than excellence.
I agree that corporations create artificial scarcity, and that it's horrible. I don't know if that's a "capitalism" problem so much as an undesirable result of what happens when a small, socially closed set of people hog lots of resources.
- oinksoft 13y agoSure, but of course there are other options. Both liberal capitalism and national socialism/state communism (Soviet) are highly centralized forms of government, whereras anarcho-syndicalism is decentralized and highly capitalist, and anarcho-communism is decentralized, based upon overproduction and a radical reimagination of property rights. Barcelona and other parts of Valencia with a strong culture of trade were famously stable (the essential city services remained up and running, etc.) flying the black flag as an anarcho-syndicalist region in the 1930s for a few years before being infiltrated by the communists and dominated later in the Spanish Civil War.