3 ms·
Sharecroppers have no rights. They didn't 200 years ago. They don't today. Doesn't make this suck any less, but it's something that needs to be discussed more.
by glesica 13y ago
Sharecroppers have no rights. They didn't 200 years ago. They don't today. Doesn't make this suck any less, but it's something that needs to be discussed more.
- ScottWhigham 13y agoI appreciate the attempt at an analogy but it fails here because of the agreement to the TOS. Both parties agreed to the etsy TOS which spells out, quite clearly, what each's responsibilities are. So yes, Brendan has rights afforded/accorded by the TOS - and those are enforceable rights were he to choose to go that route.
- glesica 13y agoSharecroppers had rights, too. But when one party can cut off the other party's livelihood, it essentially suppresses the technical "rights" of the second party. Every American has a "right" to a fair trial. But it is well-documented that if you can't afford a decent lawyer, "fair" becomes an unfortunately flexible concept.