3 ms·
Clearly neither system works reliably, but just to put that suggestion in context: http://reddit.com/info/2r8d8/comments http://reddit.com/info/2r8d8/comments
by thomasptacek 19y ago
Clearly neither system works reliably, but just to put that suggestion in context:
http://reddit.com/info/2r8d8/comments http://reddit.com/info/2r8d8/comments
vs.
http://programming.reddit.com/info/2qbye/comments http://programming.reddit.com/info/2qbye/comments
"Quality" sounds like a good metric until you realize that upvotes mean "I agree!", not "Good comment".
- auferstehung 19y agoI agree. That is why I purposely did not equate quality with up and down voting, but left it undefined. Perhaps a solution could be that the quality of a comment was ranked by the number and quality of sub-comments. We would have the beginning of a highly ranked comment thread, for example.
- bct 19y agoAnother alternative is a two-axis system. Up-down for agree-disagree, left-right for quality.
- Jd 19y agoDoes anything like this exist that you are aware of?
- oditogre 19y agoI've never heard of anything like this, though I've thought of it quite a long while back for Reddit. The problem is that it won't solve anything. Most people will still downvote / leftvote things they don't agree with and upvote / rightvote things they do agree with. If the desire to silence a dissenting opinion could be controlled by the majority of people, free speech would not be such a rare thing, let alone need to be written into law.